How Residual Renal Function Influences Survival
The importance of RRF in dialysis patients can only be appreciated when one considers its influence on nutrition, cardiovascular function, mineral metabolism and maintenance of hemoglobin levels. Loss of RRF increases resting energy expenditure and inflammation and reduces small solute and middle molecule uremic toxin clearance, erythropoietin synthesis, phosphorus, sodium and fluid removal. These effects may result in anemia, malnutrition, cardiac hypertrophy, congestive heart failure, atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis, vascular and valvular calcification, all of which lead to an increase in overall and cardiovascular mortality and decreased quality of life (1).
RRF and Mortality
The loss of RRF is a powerful predictor of mortality (2,3). In a single-center, multivariate survival analysis of 102 dialysis patients (68 PD and 34 HD patients), Maiorca et al. illustrated that preserving RRF could significantly improve the survival of PD patients (4). For each 1-mL/min increase in the glomerular ﬁltration rate (GFR), there was an associated 40% reduction in the risk of death in the entire cohort and a 50% reduction in PD patients. In a single-center study, Shemin et al. (N=114 HD patients) showed that the presence of any RRF (deﬁned as urine volume >100 mL/d) was independently associated with a 65% decrease in the risk of death (5). Wang and colleagues identified that loss of RRF was closely associated with increased resting energy expenditure, and resting energy expenditure was predictive of higher mortality and cardiovascular death in chronic PD patients (6). The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2 (NECOSAD-2, N=740 incident HD patients), demonstrated that for each 1-unit/week increase in renal Kt/Vurea, there was a 66% decrease in the relative risk of death (7).
The Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study showed a survival beneﬁt with increasing total (renal and peritoneal) small-solute clearance in 680 incident PD patients (8). A secondary analysis of data from the CANUSA study showed that this benefit was due to RRF with each 5-L/wk/1.73 m2 increment in GFR being associated with a 12% decrease in the relative risk of death (9). Additionally, for every 250 mL of urine output, the overall mortality decreased by 36% (9). The initial analysis was performed under the assumption that peritoneal and renal small-solute clearances were equivalent and therefore additive. The re-analysis, however, was unable to identify an independent association between survival and peritoneal clearance of small molecules. The ADEMEX (Adequacy of Peritoneal Dialysis in Mexico) study also demonstrated that residual renal clearance and dialytic clearance were not equivalent or additive (10). In this study, RRF was shown to be the most important factor to directly influence patients’ survival rates. Increasing solute clearance in PD did not result in better survival in anuric patients.
RRF and Inflammation
Chronic inflammation is a common finding in chronically dialyzed patients (12-65%), and may actually be part of the pathophysiology of chronic renal disease (11). It appears that the inflammatory component may be present even in pre-dialysis CKD patients. CKD patients show an inverse relationship between renal function and pro-inﬂammatory mediators (12). Animal and in vitro studies suggest that as RRF declines, inflammation is accentuated due to increased oxidative stress and activation of monocytes and cytokines in the vascular endothelium (13,14). This, in turn, can further perpetuate RRF loss (15). Various studies have demonstrated increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal failure (ESRD) (11,16). Nephrectomized rats showed impaired cytokine clearance, suggesting that the kidneys may play a role in cytokine handling (17). In incident and prevalent PD patients, loss of RRF was associated with an increased inﬂammatory component that was due to C-reactive protein or vascular cell adhesion molecules (18,19). Although the exact mechanism is as yet unknown, the relationship between RRF and inﬂammation was shown to be independent of the patients’ cardiovascular status (20).
RRF and Nutrition
Several studies have demonstrated that nutritional status in both HD and PD patients is better in the presence of RRF (21-24). Parameters such as appetite, dietary protein and total caloric intake assessed using questionnaires were increased in the presence of RRF. Wang et al. showed that the uptake of micronutrients was also greater when dialysis patients had RRF. Several markers of nutritional status such as subjective global assessment, lean body mass and handgrip strength were all shown to correlate with RRF (25); no such relationship with peritoneal urea clearance was found. It has also been proposed that the link between RRF decline and malnutrition status in PD patients may be due to a close association with the resting energy expenditure (6). A sustained increase in resting energy expenditure may lead to an imbalance in energy and malnutrition, which leads to a catabolic state, if not compensated for by an increase in energy intake.
RRF and Volume Control
The importance of RRF in maintaining fluid balance is becoming increasingly apparent. Extracellular ﬂuid volumes were found to be higher in PD patients with a residual GFR below 2 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to those above 2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (26). This suggests that the degree of water removal by the diseased kidneys remains very important in determining the survival of patients on PD (27). Patients with a history of volume overload were shown to have more severe cardiovascular issues (28). In addition, blood pressure control was shown to worsen with decreasing RRF (29) and was associated with higher arterial pulse pressure (30). Although the role of RRF in maintaining volume control in patients on dialysis is not fully understood, poor RRF might contribute to a higher amount of extracellular fluid, which has been associated with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (31).
Wang AY, Lai KN. The importance of residual renal function in dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006 May;69(10):1726-32.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16612329
Brener ZZ, Kotanko P, Thijssen S, Winchester JF, Bergman M. Clinical benefit of preserving residual renal function in dialysis patients: an update for clinicians. Am J Med Sci. 2010 May;339(5):453-6.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20375877
Rădulescu D, Ferechide D. The importance of residual renal function in chronic dialysed patients. J Med Life. 2009 Apr-Jun;2(2):199-206. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20108541
Maiorca R, Brunori G, Zubani R, Cancarini GC, Manili L, Camerini C, Movilli E, Pola A, d’Avolio G, Gelatti U. Predictive value of dialysis adequacy and nutritional indices for mortality and morbidity in CAPD and HD patients. A longitudinal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995 Dec;10(12):2295-305. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8808229
Wang AY, Sea MM, Tang N, Sanderson JE, Lui SF, Li PK, Woo J. Resting energy expenditure and subsequent mortality risk in peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Dec;15(12):3134-43.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15579517
Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, Korevaar JC, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT: Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: An analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Apr;15(4):1061-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15034110
Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group: Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: Association with clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Feb;7(2):198-207.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8785388
Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN; CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: a reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001 Oct;12(10):2158-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11562415
Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, et al: Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 May;13(5):1307-20.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11961019
Miyamoto T, Carrero JJ, Stenvinkel P. Inflammation as a risk factor and target for therapy in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2011 Nov;20(6):662-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21825982
Shlipak MG, Fried LF, Crump C et al. Elevations of inflammatory and procoagulant biomarkers in elderly persons with renal insufficiency. Circulation. 2003 Jan 7;107(1):87-92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12515748
Carmona AA, Rigon BG, Barroso MP, Hauser AB, Précoma D, Bucharles S, Noronha L, Pécoits-Filho R. Induction of systemic inflammation and thickening of subepicardiac arteries in an animal model of uremia. J Bras Nefrol. 2011 Dec;33(4):408-12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22189803
Witko-Sarsat V, Friedlander M, Nguyen KT et al. Advanced oxidation protein products as novel mediators of inflammation and monocyte activation in chronic renal failure. J Immunol. 1998 Sep 1;161(5):2524-32.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9725252
Pecoits-Filho R, Heimburger O, Barany P et al. Associations between circulating inflammatory markers and residual renal function in CRF patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Jun;41(6):1212-8.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12776273
Panichi V, Maggiore U, Taccola D et al. Interleukin-6 is a stronger predictor of total and cardiovascular mortality than C-reactive protein in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 May;19(5):1154-60.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14993508
Bemelmans MH, Gouma DJ, Buurman WA. Influence of nephrectomy on tumor necrosis factor clearance in a murine model. J Immunol. 1993 Mar 1;150(5):2007-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8436831
Wang AY, Lam CW, Wang M et al. Circulating soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1: relationships with residual renal function, cardiac hypertrophy, and outcome of peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Apr;45(4):715-29. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15806475
Arici M, Walls J. End-stage renal disease, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular mortality: is C-reactive protein the missing link? Kidney Int. 2001 Feb;59(2):407-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11168922
Wang AY, Wang M, Woo J et al. Inflammation, residual kidney function and cardiac hypertrophy are interrelated and combine adversely to enhance mortality and cardiovascular death risk of peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Aug;15(8):2186-94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15284304
Suda T, Hiroshige K, Ohta T, et al: The contribution of residual renal function to overall nutritional status in chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Mar;15(3):396-401.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10692527
Wang AY, Sea MM, Ip R, et al: Independent effects of residual renal function and dialysis adequacy on actual dietary protein, calorie, and other nutrient intake in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001 Nov;12(11):2450-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11675422
Wang AY, Sea MM, Ip R, et al: Independent effects of residual renal function and dialysis adequacy on dietary micronutrient intakes in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Sep;76(3):569-76. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12198001
Szeto CC, Lai KN, Wong TY, et al: Independent effects of residual renal function and dialysis adequacy on nutritional status and patient outcome in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Dec;34(6):1056-64.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10585315
Wang AY, Sea MM, Ho ZS, Lui SF, Li PK, Woo J: Evaluation of handgrip strength as a nutritional marker and prognostic indicator in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jan;81(1):79-86.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15640464
Konings CJ, Kooman JP, Schonck M et al. Fluid status in CAPD patients is related to peritoneal transport and residual renal function: evidence from a longitudinal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Apr;18(4):797-803.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12637651
Menon MK, Naimark DM, Bargman JM et al. Long-term blood pressure control in a cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients and its association with residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001 Nov;16(11):2207-13.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11682669
Wang AY, Wang M, Woo J et al. A novel association between residual renal function and left ventricular hypertrophy in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002 Aug;62(2):639-47. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12110029
Fagugli RM, Pasini P, Quintaliani G et al. Association between extracellular water, left ventricular mass and hypertension in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Nov;18(11):2332-8.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14551362
P/N 101804-01 Rev A 06/2012